# bore vs rustunnel

> Two self-hosted [ngrok alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/ngrok), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bore | rustunnel |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 23 in Remote Access | #13 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 11 561 ✓ | 658 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.8.5 · 4 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

bore scores 66/100 against 53/100 for rustunnel, so it is the safer default.

rustunnel ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for bore.

If you want the quickest setup, bore is easier to run; rustunnel needs more configuration.

bore is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bore](https://selfhost.directory/project/bore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bore.md)
- [rustunnel](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustunnel) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustunnel.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bore-vs-rustunnel