# bore vs portr

> Two self-hosted [ngrok alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/ngrok), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bore | portr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 23 in Remote Access | #8 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 11 561 ✓ | 3 189 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 ✓ | +-2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.0.0 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

bore scores 66/100 against 58/100 for portr, so it is the safer default.

portr ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for bore.

If you want the quickest setup, bore is easier to run; portr needs more configuration.

bore is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bore](https://selfhost.directory/project/bore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bore.md)
- [portr](https://selfhost.directory/project/portr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bore-vs-portr