# bore vs octelium

> Two self-hosted [ngrok alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/ngrok), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bore | octelium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 23 in Remote Access | #22 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 11 561 ✓ | 4 133 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | +65 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

bore scores 66/100 against 59/100 for octelium, so it is the safer default.

octelium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for bore.

If you want the quickest setup, bore is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.

## Details

- [bore](https://selfhost.directory/project/bore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bore.md)
- [octelium](https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octelium.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bore-vs-octelium