# bookwyrm vs ytdlp_web_player

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | ytdlp_web_player |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 ✓ | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.

If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [ytdlp_web_player](https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-ytdlpwebplayer