# bookwyrm vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.

WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for bookwyrm.

If you want the quickest setup, WPS Office is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-wps-office