# bookwyrm vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 8 651 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +156 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-workout-cool