bookwyrmvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Winter CMS scores 62/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Winter CMS is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →Winter CMS details →