# bookwyrm vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 4 338 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +46 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 ✓ | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

WhisperLive---CPU scores 64/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.

If you want the quickest setup, WhisperLive---CPU is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

WhisperLive---CPU is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-whisperlive-cpu