bookwyrmvswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
wanderer scores 64/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for wanderer.
If you want the quickest setup, wanderer is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
wanderer is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →wanderer details →