# bookwyrm vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-url-to-png