# bookwyrm vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 ✓ | 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-unbagrnd