# bookwyrm vs Typecho

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | Typecho |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 12 456 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 ✓ | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 ✓ | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Typecho scores 66/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.

If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [Typecho](https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-typecho