bookwyrmvsTypecho
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | Typecho | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 12 455 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Typecho scores 66/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.
If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →Typecho details →