bookwyrmvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →Tube Archivist details →