bookwyrmvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
transfer.sh scores 69/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm details →transfer.sh details →