# bookwyrm vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 117 704 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +5 345 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-tradingagents