# bookwyrm vs textsnap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | textsnap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.

If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [textsnap](https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-textsnap