bookwyrmvsSSH & Web Terminal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | SSH & Web Terminal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #30 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 542 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
SSH & Web Terminal scores 60/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
SSH & Web Terminal ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for bookwyrm.
If you want the quickest setup, SSH & Web Terminal is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →SSH & Web Terminal details →