# bookwyrm vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana