# bookwyrm vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 11 122 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +100 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 12 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

SonarQube scores 71/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

SonarQube is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-sonarqube