# bookwyrm vs QMReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | QMReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 ✓ | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.

QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for bookwyrm.

If you want the quickest setup, QMReader is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [QMReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-qmreader