bookwyrmvsPVE-UPS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | PVE-UPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #20 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 356 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v4.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 51/100 for PVE-UPS, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PVE-UPS.
If you want the quickest setup, PVE-UPS is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →PVE-UPS details →