# bookwyrm vs Plausible Analytics

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | Plausible Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 29 708 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +501 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 ✓ | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Plausible Analytics.

If you want the quickest setup, Plausible Analytics is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

Plausible Analytics is growing faster right now (+501 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [Plausible Analytics](https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-plausible-analytics