# bookwyrm vs piclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | piclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #26 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 ✓ | 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.3.4 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 53/100 for piclaw, so it is the safer default.

piclaw ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for bookwyrm.

If you want the quickest setup, piclaw is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [piclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/piclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-piclaw