# bookwyrm vs PicImpact

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | PicImpact |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #14 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 ✓ | 1 315 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v3.3.8 · 23 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 57/100 for PicImpact, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for PicImpact.

If you want the quickest setup, PicImpact is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [PicImpact](https://selfhost.directory/project/picimpact) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/picimpact.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-picimpact