# bookwyrm vs OpenTakeoff

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | OpenTakeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #22 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 ✓ | 714 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | mcp-v0.9.100 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 56/100 for OpenTakeoff, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for OpenTakeoff.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenTakeoff is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [OpenTakeoff](https://selfhost.directory/project/opentakeoff) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opentakeoff.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-opentakeoff