# bookwyrm vs OpenDesign

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | OpenDesign |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 7 in Design |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 104 697 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +1 866 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | open-design-v0.26.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenDesign scores 83/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenDesign.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenDesign is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

OpenDesign is growing faster right now (+1 866 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [OpenDesign](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-design) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-design.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-open-design