# bookwyrm vs Omoide

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | Omoide |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #37 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 ✓ | 277 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v0.7.6 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 40/100 for Omoide, so it is the safer default.

Omoide ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for bookwyrm.

If you want the quickest setup, Omoide is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [Omoide](https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-omoide