bookwyrmvsOmniRoute
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | OmniRoute | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 82 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +3 226 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 226 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →OmniRoute details →