# bookwyrm vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 9 170 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +60 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-octoprint