bookwyrmvsOctoBot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | OctoBot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 6 872 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +257 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OctoBot scores 69/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for OctoBot.
If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
OctoBot is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →OctoBot details →