bookwyrmvsNATS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | NATS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 20 957 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +192 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 18 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
NATS scores 80/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for bookwyrm.
If you want the quickest setup, NATS is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
NATS is growing faster right now (+192 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →NATS details →