# bookwyrm vs musikat

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | musikat |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 ✓ | 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 41/100 for musikat, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for musikat.

If you want the quickest setup, musikat is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [musikat](https://selfhost.directory/project/musikat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/musikat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-musikat