# bookwyrm vs multica

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | multica |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #10 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 54 233 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +2 925 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 87 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for bookwyrm.

If you want the quickest setup, multica is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 925 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-multica