# bookwyrm vs motionEye

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 4 721 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +36 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

motionEye scores 65/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-motioneye