# bookwyrm vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 46 477 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +1 333 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 333 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-mitmproxy