# bookwyrm vs LubeLogger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | LubeLogger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 2 926 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +69 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

LubeLogger scores 65/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for bookwyrm.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

LubeLogger is growing faster right now (+69 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-lubelogger