# bookwyrm vs Liquidsoap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | Liquidsoap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #8 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 ✓ | 1 742 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | OCaml |

## Which one should you pick?

Liquidsoap scores 62/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Liquidsoap.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [Liquidsoap](https://selfhost.directory/project/liquidsoap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/liquidsoap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-liquidsoap