# bookwyrm vs LabTether

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | LabTether |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #8 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 ✓ | 233 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.4.0 · 17 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 51/100 for LabTether, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for LabTether.

If you want the quickest setup, LabTether is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [LabTether](https://selfhost.directory/project/labtether) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/labtether.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-labtether