# bookwyrm vs Incus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | Incus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #3 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 6 520 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +274 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Incus scores 75/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for bookwyrm.

Incus is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [Incus](https://selfhost.directory/project/incus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/incus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-incus