# bookwyrm vs Healthchecks

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | Healthchecks |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 10 469 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +107 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 12 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-healthchecks