# bookwyrm vs hass-configurator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | hass-configurator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 ✓ | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

If you want the quickest setup, hass-configurator is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-hass-configurator