bookwyrmvshass-configurator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | hass-configurator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
If you want the quickest setup, hass-configurator is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →hass-configurator details →