# bookwyrm vs gluetun

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookwyrm | gluetun |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #5 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 15 910 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +312 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 ✓ | v3.41.3 · 30 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

gluetun scores 75/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.

bookwyrm ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for gluetun.

If you want the quickest setup, gluetun is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.

gluetun is growing faster right now (+312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookwyrm](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookwyrm.md)
- [gluetun](https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gluetun.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookwyrm-vs-gluetun