# bookorbit vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 5 902 | 15 762 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 224 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 74/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Zigbee2MQTT.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Zigbee2MQTT needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 224 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-zigbee2mqtt