# bookorbit vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 5 882 ✓ | 4 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 252 ✓ | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 73/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 252 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-whisperlive-cpu