# bookorbit vs 墨台 · VibeHolding

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | 墨台 · VibeHolding |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 901 ✓ | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 223 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 74/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for 墨台 · VibeHolding.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; 墨台 · VibeHolding needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [墨台 · VibeHolding](https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vibe-holding.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-vibe-holding