# bookorbit vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 872 | 117 655 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 242 | +5 296 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-tradingagents