# bookorbit vs tesserae

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | tesserae |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #14 of 44 in Dashboard |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 ✓ | 982 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 216 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 78 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.480.0 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 74/100 against 51/100 for tesserae, so it is the safer default.

tesserae ships more often: 78 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for bookorbit.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; tesserae needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 216 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [tesserae](https://selfhost.directory/project/tesserae) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tesserae.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-tesserae