# bookorbit vs Single Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | Single Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #8 of 11 in Deployment |
| GitHub stars | 5 901 ✓ | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 223 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.2.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 74/100 against 44/100 for Single Server, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Single Server.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Single Server needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [Single Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-singleserver